BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Melgaço ACC, Alves AF, Pessoa WFB. Polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation and gut dysbiosis: Clinical implications beyond colon cleansing. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(35): 118836 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118836]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The World Journal of Gastroenterology is a credible and well-established journal in the field of gastroenterology. The editorial process was conducted professionally, and the manuscript received appropriate editorial and peer-review attention. The peer-review process was constructive and contributed to improving the scientific quality and presentation of our manuscript. We appreciated the comments and guidance provided by the reviewers and editorial team throughout the revision process. We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the editors, peer reviewers, language editors, and production team for their support throughout the publication process. The editorial guidance was valuable in strengthening our manuscript and adapting it to the Opinion Review format. We were pleased with the professionalism and cooperation of the editorial team and are grateful for the opportunity to publish our work in the World Journal of Gastroenterology. We look forward to future opportunities to contribute to the journal.